
Colorado PhysTEC project leader Valerie Otero helps a Learning Assistant with an experiment during the PTEC Learning Assistant Workshop on October 24-25, 2007.
PhysTEC Project Contact
University of Colorado at Boulder
Noah Finkelstein
University of Colorado
Department of Physics
UCB-390
Boulder, CO 80309-0390
Tel: 303-735-6082
University of Colorado's PhysTEC Website
Assessment at other PhysTEC Sites
Ball State University
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
Cornell University
Florida International University
Seattle Pacific University
Towson University
University of Arizona
University of Arkansas
University of Colorado at Boulder
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Western Michigan University
A. Concept Exam Data for Calculus-based Introductory Physics
FMCE DATA for 1st semester Introductory Calculus-based Physics |
|||||
Semester |
N | Pretest (%) ~+/-1% |
Posttest (%) ~+/-1-2% |
Ave normalized gain ~+/-.02 | Gain of averages |
Sp 2004 |
335 | 28.2 | 73.9 | .66 | .64 |
Fa 2004 ** |
392 | 33.2 | 69.0 | .59 | .54 |
Sp 2005 * |
213 | 28.4 | 58.5 | .45 | .42 |
Fa 2005 * |
293 | 32.1 | 58.3 | .42 | .39 |
Sp 2006 |
278 | 2635 | 59.5 | .47 | .45 |
Fa 2006 |
331 | 33.2 | 67.1 | .53 | .51 |
Sp 2007 |
363 | 28.6 | 61.7 | .49 | .46 |
N is the number of matched students.
* means no Tutorials (and no LAs): these had traditional recitations
** means no Tutorials (and no LAs) - but they utilized small-group recitations centered on research-based workbook materials.
All the rest used UW Tutorials and LAs.
BEMA Data for 2nd semester Introductory Calculus-based Physics |
||||
Semester |
N | Pretest (%) ~ +/-1% |
Posttest (%) ~ +/- 1-2% |
Ave normalized gain ~ +/- .02 |
Fa 2004 |
319 | 26.2 | 58.9 | .44 |
Sp 2005 |
232 | 27.4 | 58.7 | .43 |
Fa 2005 |
325 | 25.2 | 49.5 | .33 |
Sp 2006 |
196 | 26.4 | 53.4 | .37 |
Fa 2006 |
351 | 26.3 | 55.7 | .40 |
Sp 2009 |
260 | N/A | 52.8 | N/A |
N is the number of matched students.
B. Concept Exam Data for Learning Assistants
Mechanics (Calc-based) FCME Data for LAs |
||||
| Semester | Number LAs | Pre-Ave | Post Ave | Gain of Ave |
| Sp06 | 5 | 98.3 | 100 | 1.0 |
| Fa06 | 7 | 88.7 | 98.5 | 0.87 |
| Sp07 | 7 | 87.4 | 94.8 | .59 |
(No LAs were used in this course for the 3 semesters preceding the above, no data for before)
Learning Assistant data only (not all matched - typically missing 1student for pre and/or post)
E&M: Calc-based: BEMA Data for LAs |
||||
| Semester | Number LAs | Pre-Ave | Post Ave | Gain of Ave |
| Fa04 | 8 | .54 | .73 | .42 |
| Sp05 | 6 | .75 | .9 | .61 |
| Fa05 | 8 | .66 | .76 | .31 |
| Sp06 | 5 | .73 | .81 | .31 |
| Fa06 | 6 | .64 | .71 | .19 |
| Sp07 | 4 | .71 | .80 | .31 |
Learning Assistant data (not all matched, but most are matched)
C. Upper Division Learning Retention

Below we see evidence that the Tutorial experience in freshman year translates to significantly improved BEMA scores at the upper division level, and that being an LA moves scores up to levels comparable to what we measure for incoming graduate Teaching assistants whose average BEMA score (before teaching) is 80 +/- 4% (N=15)
D. Attitudes and Beliefs of Future Teachers
The Colorado Learning Attitudes About Science Survey (CLASS) was administered to 395 PET and Physical Science and Everyday Thinking students from 10 different colleges and universities with 12 different instructors. Aggregate results show an average 9% gain in PET and PSET courses compared to average gains of -6.1% to +1.8% found in other physical science courses designed especially for elementary teachers.